considering a divorce in california

Articles By Attorneys And Scholars
About Family Law

From the Law Offices of Lowenstein Brown,
A Professional Law Corporation

San Diego's Divorce Lawyers
619 298-6246

BE SURE TO CHECK THE LINKS AT THE BOTTOM
OF THIS PAGE FOR MORE ARTICLES!

 

PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS AND THEIR EQUIVALENT FOR REGISTERED DOMESTIC PATNERSHIPS

by Michele Sacks Lowenstein, Attorney at Law,
Certified Family Specialist, State Bar California

1.            DEFINITIONS:   A prenuptial agreement or premarital agreement is an agreement entered into by two people in contemplation of marriage.  There is no “official” name for an agreement entered into by two people who are planning to become Registered Domestic Partners.  Is calling the “equivalent” a prenuptial agreement fair to people who don’t have the legal ability to marry?  For our purposes when not specifically referring to agreements entered into in contemplation of marriage we will use the all encompassing term “agreement”.  It is important to make the distinction for purposes of understanding the history of these types of agreements and the limitations faced by people who are unable to marry.

 

2.         Do they only apply to people are legally “married”? 

No.  So long as you are not contracting for an illegal purpose (sexual services for example) parties are free to make agreements which affect the disposition of their property and rights of support.  (This does not include child support or child custody – discussed below.)

 

3.         What’s the difference between a registered domestic partnership and a marriage? 

Since 2005 registered domestic partners in California have the same rights and obligations as married couples.  This means:

    A. All the rights and obligations as spouses including the requirement to support each other.

    B. Community Property Rights – The creation of community property with the same rights of survivor and equal management and control as spouses.

    C. Joint obligation for community debts incurred during the partnership.

    D. The right not to be excluded from the dwelling of another except in certain circumstances.

    E. Custody and visitation rights where the children belong to both partners and limited rights where step parent rights apply.  (Cannot be limited by agreement.)

    F. Death Related Matters – The right to control the disposition of a partner’s remains; authorize an autopsy; make anatomical gifts and authorization of exhumation of a deceased partner.  The right to be buried in a joint or family cemetery plot and to identification as the surviving partner on a death certificate.  Probate righths.

    G. The collection of compensation provided to victims of violent crimes. 

    H. Legal Rights - The privilege of confidential communications between partners.  The right to sue for loss of consortium, the right to sue for wrongful death.

    I. The requirement to file a joint tax return in California.  Not a Federal requirement.  In fact, it is not allowed.

 

4.         Why have an agreement? 

Traditionally the purpose of a prenuptial agreement is to provide for alternative form of the division or distribution of property upon Death or Divorce.  (The big “Ds” – one will always get you; sometimes the other will, too.)  Rather than have the law of the state of a person’s residence control the division or distribution of assets – the parties decide for themselves how the assets should be divided or distributed.

 

5.         How long have these agreements existed in California? 

Certainly since the 19th Century.  In an attempt to gain uniformity over the construction of these agreements the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA) was drafted in 1983 and adopted, to date, by 27 states including California.  It replaced sections of the California Civil Code which previously governed the construction of these kinds of agreements.

 

6.         What kinds of topics to these agreements cover? 

The waiver of community property rights, including businesses, real estate, retirement plans, etc.  Where enforceable they parties may waive spousal support.  Other topics include the liability for loans and the receipt of loan proceeds as well as the waiver of probate rights.  Parties may specify  who will own the home and who be able to live it upon the death of a party.  These agreements become a contract.

 

7.         Can these agreements be enforced in other states?

Yes.

 

8.         What do the agreements not cover? 

Custody, religion, personal habits (smoking/not smoking), liquidated damages for being unfaithful, child support.

 

9.         What about spousal support/alimony waivers? 

These have recently been permitted in California but note that Family Code Section 1612 states that they are not enforceable unless the party against whom enforcement is sought was represented by an attorney and even if represented by an attorney the provision regarding spousal support is unconscionable at the time of enforcement.

 

10.       What else would make an agreement unenforceable? 

Failure by one party to disclose his or her assets and obligations and the absence of a valid waiver to have that disclosure.  Failure to have seven days to review the agreement prior to its execution.  Terms that are promotive of divorce are unenforceable – payment of a large lump sum which encourages the potential recipient to file for a divorce.  If you move to another state and it is not enforceable outside of California.  If there is fraud, duress or undue influence.  The original agreement and all copies have been lost.  For reasons that are unanticipated.  This area of the law is frequently subject to change.

 

11.       What if the parties fail to abide by the agreement and acquire community property? 

This will render the agreement ineffective.

 

12.       How do you minimize a successful attack on an agreement? 

Make sure both parties are represented by counsel; that they have had ample time to review the agreement (no last minute agreements).  Try to negotiate a “fair” agreement – don’t given the other party incentive to attack the agreement.  Make sure the agreement is clearly written.  And, abide by the terms of the agreement.

 

13.       Can you amend the agreement? 

Yes, but note that it then becomes a post nuptial agreement and there are different rules.  The largest issue is that once married or once you are a registered domestic partner you have fiduciary duty to the other.  Again, each side needs to be represented by counsel.

 

14.       When do you want to amend the agreement? 

If there is a change in the law or in your finances.  If you move it would be a good idea to have it reviewed by an attorney living in your new state although note that properly written agreement will contain a “choice of laws clause”.  (The agreement will set forth which State’s law governs the agreement.)

 

15.       Are there different considerations for registered domestic partners if they are treated the same as married couples? 

Yes.  For married couples transfers between spouses are nontaxable.  This is only true for registered domestic partners under California tax law.  This is not true with respect for federal law. And, because of this, for the registered domestic partner, the need for this type of agreement can be even more critical.  Spousal support payments are not recognized by the Federal government in same sex divorces or the dissolution of a registered domestic partnership.  Most states don’t recognize registered domestic partnerships or same sex marriages.

 

16.       How are these agreements negotiated? 

Traditionally, one person gets the agreement drafted and has his or her

 

17.       Do you have a checklist?

    A. Make a list of all your assets and debts.  You will also need the back up documents.

    B. How do you want to handle assets you acquired prior to the marriage or the registered domestic partnerships?  Will they remain your separate property (this means no joint interest.)  How you will handle the payment of premarital or pre partnership debts?  Will there be some “credit” for paying down the mortgage of a house you owned prior to marriage or partnership?  Will a party have the right to be reimbursed for payment of a pre marital or pre partnership debt?  (Think about not only mortgage payments but school loans and credit cards as well as spousal or child support obligations which have been previously incurred.)

    C. What if you use premarital or pre partnership property as the down payment on the house?  Do you expect to be reimbursed?  How?

    D. Do you want your income to become community property?

    E. Do you want to waive spousal support?  (Assuming this provision is enforceable at a future date.)

    F. What estate planning provisions do you wish to make?  Is this a second marriage or partnership?  Do you children from a previous relationship?

    G. If this is a same sex relationship, how are you going to handle the fact that transfers between you and your partner will still be taxable in eyes of the Internal Revenue Service?  The tax impact is very severe upon the division of retirement accounts in this instance and may not even be very workable from the perspective of Federal law.  Note the difference between PERS and FERS benefits.attorney present it to the attorney for the other party. The parties do everything through their counsel and treat the agreement as if it is a large pink suede elephant.  More recently, there has movement to have the parties meet together with their attorneys and frequently a tax advisor (a must in a same sex relationship) to engage in a meaningful, holistic discussion.

SELECTED STATUTES

FAMILY CODE SECTION 1611
A premarital agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. It is enforceable without consideration.

FAMILY CODE SECTION 1612
Parties to a premarital agreement may contract with respect to all of the following:
(1) The rights and obligations of each of the parties in any of the property of either or both of them whenever and wherever acquired or located.
(2) The right to buy, sell, use, transfer, exchange, abandon, lease, consume, expend, assign, create a security interest in, mortgage, encumber, dispose of, or otherwise manage and control property.
(3) The disposition of property upon separation, marital dissolution, death, or the occurrence or nonoccurrence of any other event.
(4) The making of a will, trust, or other arrangement to carry out the provisions of the agreement.
(5) The ownership rights in and disposition of the death benefit from a life insurance policy.
(6) The choice of law governing the construction of the agreement.
(7) Any other matter, including their personal rights and obligations, not in violation of public policy or a statute imposing a criminal penalty.
(b) The right of a child to support may not be adversely affected by a premarital agreement.
(c) Any provision in a premarital agreement regarding spousal support, including, but not limited to, a waiver of it, is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement of the spousal support provision is sought was not represented by independent counsel at the time the agreement containing the provision was signed, or if the provision regarding spousal support is unconscionable at the time of enforcement. An otherwise unenforceable provision in a premarital agreement regarding spousal support may not become enforceable solely because the party against whom enforcement is sought was represented by independent counsel."

FAMILY CODE SECTION 1615
(a) A premarital agreement is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves either of the following:
(1) That party did not execute the agreement voluntarily.
(2) The agreement was unconscionable when it was executed and, before execution of the agreement, all of the following applied to that party:
(A) That party was not provided a fair, reasonable, and full disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party.
(B) That party did not voluntarily and expressly waive, in writing, any right to disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party beyond the disclosure provided.
(C) That party did not have, or reasonably could not have had, an adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the other party.
(b) An issue of unconscionability of a premarital agreement shall be decided by the court as a matter of law.
(c) For the purposes of subdivision (a), it shall be deemed that a premarital agreement was not executed voluntarily unless the court finds in writing or on the record all of the following:
(1) The party against whom enforcement is sought was represented by independent legal counsel at the time of signing the agreement or, after being advised to seek independent legal counsel, expressly waived, in a separate writing, representation by independent legal counsel.
(2) The party against whom enforcement is sought had not less than seven calendar days between the time that party was first presented with the agreement and advised to seek independent legal counsel and the time the agreement was signed.
(3) The party against whom enforcement is sought, if unrepresented by legal counsel, was fully informed of the terms and basic effect of the agreement as well as the rights and obligations he or she was giving up by signing the agreement, and was proficient in the language in which the explanation of the party's rights was conducted and in which the agreement was written. The explanation of the rights and obligations relinquished shall be memorialized in writing and delivered to the party prior to signing the agreement. The unrepresented party shall, on or before the signing of the premarital agreement, execute a document declaring that he or she received the information required by this paragraph and indicating who provided that information.
(4) The agreement and the writings executed pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (3) were not executed under duress, fraud, or undue influence, and the parties did not lack capacity to enter into the agreement.
(5) Any other factors the court deems relevant.” (Fam. Code §1615.)
NOTES: (1) Effective 1/1/2002, subsection (a)(2)(A) was amended to state that one of the requirements for showing unconscionability is the failure of the other party to provide: “a fair, reasonable and ••full•• disclosure of the property or financial obligations ....”
(2) The burden of proving that a premarital agreement is invalid is on the party alleging its invalidity. (In re Marriage of Iverson (1992) 11 Cal.App.4th 1495, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 70, card ß{PrAT 255.00}, citing to the Comment to section 6 of the UPAA, enacted as former Civil Code section 5315.)
(3) These requirements do not apply to postmarital agreements. (In re Marriage of Friedman (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 65, 122.)
(4) Fam. Code §1615 continues former Civil Code section 5315, which section was repealed effective 1/1/94. There were substantial amendments made by 2001 SB78, effective 1/1/2002.

FAMILY CODE §1615

(a) A premarital agreement is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves either of the following:
(1) That party did not execute the agreement voluntarily.
(2) The agreement was unconscionable when it was executed and, before execution of the agreement, all of the following applied to that party:
(A) That party was not provided a fair, reasonable, and full disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party.
(B) That party did not voluntarily and expressly waive, in writing, any right to disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party beyond the disclosure provided.
(C) That party did not have, or reasonably could not have had, an adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the other party.
(b) An issue of unconscionability of a premarital agreement shall be decided by the court as a matter of law.
(c) For the purposes of subdivision (a), it shall be deemed that a premarital agreement was not executed voluntarily unless the court finds in writing or on the record all of the following:
(1) The party against whom enforcement is sought was represented by independent legal counsel at the time of signing the agreement or, after being advised to seek independent legal counsel, expressly waived, in a separate writing, representation by independent legal counsel.
(2) The party against whom enforcement is sought had not less than seven calendar days between the time that party was first presented with the agreement and advised to seek independent legal counsel and the time the agreement was signed.
(3) The party against whom enforcement is sought, if unrepresented by legal counsel, was fully informed of the terms and basic effect of the agreement as well as the rights and obligations he or she was giving up by signing the agreement, and was proficient in the language in which the explanation of the party's rights was conducted and in which the agreement was written. The explanation of the rights and obligations relinquished shall be memorialized in writing and delivered to the party prior to signing the agreement. The unrepresented party shall, on or before the signing of the premarital agreement, execute a document declaring that he or she received the information required by this paragraph and indicating who provided that information.
(4) The agreement and the writings executed pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (3) were not executed under duress, fraud, or undue influence, and the parties did not lack capacity to enter into the agreement.
(5) Any other factors the court deems relevant. (Am Stats 2001, C286)


Download This Article in PDF Format